Dear Mr.
Miller:
As you are
aware, thousands of persons from Guatemala , Honduras , and El Salvador are queuing up in Mexico at U.S. Ports of Entry in hopes of
being able to apply for asylum in the U.S.
As a result of the overwhelming number of applicants, many of those who
are allowed to enter and apply for asylum, are being taken into DHS custody
where they may remain for very long periods of time while awaiting a hearing. Others are being released into the U.S. after being given Notices to
Appear before an Immigration Judge (most never appear for their hearing dates).
Neither of these options would seems satisfactory or desired by the applicants
or the government.
Please
consider the below information regarding a possible alternative to this crisis.
Before I proceed, let me introduce myself. My name is Ben
Ferro. I served as a District Director at the U.S. Immigration and
Naturalization Service for twenty-three years in three major Districts at Buffalo , New
York ; Rome , Italy ;
and Baltimore , Maryland . As
the Director in Rome one
of my major responsibilities was to oversee and manage all immigration and
security vetting and refugee and asylum processing of tens of thousands of
persons from Europe and
the Middle East ,
including those from Iraq , Iran ,
and the former Soviet Union . Prior to this assignment, I was the Director
of the first and only “Legalization Program” (Asylum Program) during the Reagan
and Bush Administration.
As noted above, the current policy of DHS is to allow
third-party nationals, i.e. persons who are not Mexican or Canadian citizens,
who arrive in the United States at
a port of entry to make a "credible fear of persecution" declaration,
which is a skeleton precursor for making a formal application for asylum in the
U.S. Most of these arriving aliens are found to
have a “credible fear”, based solely upon their own unsupported testimony. However,
of these, most formal presented claims when adjudicated by an Immigration Judge
months or even years later, are denied asylum.
By way of background, the reason that these arriving aliens
are allowed to file for asylum at the port of entry is based in U.S. law-
Section 208(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act which provides that
any alien arriving at a U.S. Port of Entry may apply for asylum. However,
Section 208(a)(2) of that same law states that this right to apply for asylum
does not apply to a third-county national coming from a "safe third
country", such as Canada or Mexico . In such cases, that arriving alien may be
made to return to Mexico or Canada ,
and either file an asylum claim with that country, or make a claim for U.S. refugee
status at one of our many American Consulates located in those countries.
This is exactly how refugee processing is done overseas;
prospective refugees apply for such status at an American Consulate or Embassy
abroad.
If their application is granted, they are allowed to enter
the U.S. as
Refugees. If they are denied, it is up to the country where they are located to
determine their continued presence there, if they are not citizens of that
country. The point is that, while they
are waiting for the refugee process to be completed, they are waiting outside
of the U.S.
Finally, I must point out that Aliens being allowed to enter
the United States
merely through the first stage “credible fear” process have, of course, not
been screened before arriving in the United
States . As you know many of these
aliens come to the United
States without documents or with
false identities, and arrive from countries in which there is significant
criminal and terrorist activity. The “credible
fear claims” of all aliens should be thoroughly vetted before they enter this
country, and appropriate resources must be directed to the review of the asylum
applications filed by those individuals while they await in “safe third
countries.”
Sincerely yours,
Ben Ferro
InsideINS.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
We value your comments